At first glance, Proposition 35 seems like an easy choice.
A “Yes” vote is a nod in favor longer prison sentences and higher fines – up to a million dollars – for human traffickers. Prop. 35 would also require human traffickers to register as sex offenders, and it demands that registered sex offenders disclose all of their Internet identities.
“In my 23 years as a prosecutor, I have to say, I have never seen a defendant as manipulative and dangerous as a trafficker,” said Proposition 35 co-author Sharmin Bock, an assistant D.A. in Alameda County. She said the initiative would close gaps in state law and crackdown on the lowest of the low – people who sexually exploit vulnerable women and children.
Silicon Valley businessman Chris Kelly, a former Facebook executive, has provided the bulk of funding to “Yes on 35” campaign, in excess of $2 million. The initiative is backed by two groups: California Against Slavery and the Safer California Foundation. It has the support of law enforcement associations and victims’ rights groups, the state Democratic and Republican parties and a lengthy list of elected officials, including U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.
Opponents have not raised any money, according to the latest state disclosures. But that doesn’t mean that Proposition 35 is without its detractors. Francisco Lobaco is legislative director for the American Civil Liberties Union of California. He says the provision requiring registered sex offenders to divulge their online passwords raises free-speech issues. “The Supreme Court has long held that the First Amendment protects the right to speak anonymously,” Lobaco said. “And what this initiative would do, it would significantly infringe on the right of folks who have to register as sex offenders.”
Bock said it’s no longer enough for sex offenders to register their street address. She said exploitation often happens online, hidden from law enforcement.
Another potentially thorny legal question is a provision in Prop. 35 would change state evidence laws to block defendants from raising the sexual history of a victim in human trafficking during trial.
Meanwhile, the editorial boards of some of the state’s biggest newspapers – including the L.A. Times and the Sacramento Bee – say Prop. 35 is a poorly written law with inflexible penalties and a whole host of potential unintended consequences. They point out that California already has some of the toughest punishments in the nation for human trafficking. The question for voters, the L.A. Times says, is not whether they’d like such cruelties to end, but whether this measure would help to address the problem. One criticism of Prop. 35 is it would expand the sex offender registry to include human traffickers, making it a less useful tool for law enforcement to identify potentially dangerous sexual predators.
Sex-trade workers have also complained about Prop. 35. Maxine Doogan is a prostitute and one of the initiative’s most outspoken opponents. She said the measure could further criminalize people like her. “Traffic victims already have access to services, those crimes are already being prosecuted, said Doogan, “this an unnecessary law that’s going to be greatly abused.”"
But Bock dismisses such notions. She says the purpose of the law is not to target prostitutes, but the rather the people who exploit them. She says existing state laws aren’t up to the job. “Risk of apprehension is low, the penalties are low, and profits are high,” she said.
The cost of Prop. 35 to taxpayers would be moderate, according to the state Legislative analyst. There would be new expenses of a few million dollars related to updating the sex offender registry. An unknown amount would be raised through increased fines, with most of that dedicated to human trafficking victims.
The California State Democratic Party, the California State Republican Party, the Federation of Labor, the California National Organization for Women, the California Federation of Teachers, the California Nurses Association, the NAACP and Planned Parenthood rubber stamped Prop 35 without bothering to ask to hear the opposition.
These group have neglected their responsibility to act democratically on behalf of the victims of trafficking, their own members and the public they serve when they didn't bother to vet properly this reckless ballot measure.
Its not lost on the voters that Prop 35’s exact same lock'em up and throw away the key policies are being rolled back in both Prop 34 and 36. Not only have these failed policies robbed the public trust of affordable public education but they are contrary to the democracy these member organizations claim to value.
Its of no small consequence that Prop 32 is before the voters poised take away some of these group’s right to politically associate as they have voted against their own self interest and violated the public trust in the process over and over again.
These groups have clearly made a mistake by not soliciting the No On Prop 35 when it endorsed this bait and switch ballot measure. We call on them to take responsibility and admit they didn’t act democratically when they endorsed Prop 35.
Vote No ON Prop 35
Maxine Doogan
10/23/2012
noonprop35.info
@opposeprop35
noonprop35@gmail.com
[...] Proposition 35 (Human trafficking penalties) [...]
…and also the sunshine shinning right into the camera lens.
I am really enjoying the theme/design of your web site. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A few of my blog visitors have complained about my website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any suggestions to help fix this issue?
The guidelines you provided here are rather precious. It had been such a pleasurable surprise to have that waiting for me as i woke up this very day. They are constantly to the point plus easy to learn. Thank you for the clever ideas you have shared right here
Hi there very cool site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally…I’m satisfied to find a lot of helpful information here within the submit, we need work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing.
Great stuff there, many thanks. Hope you have a great wknd
It is really a great and useful piece of info. I’m happy that you simply shared this useful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.
Hola! I’ve been reading your blog for a while now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Humble Texas! Just wanted to mention keep up the excellent job!